What can be learned from FedEx Ground’s independent contractor model

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal yesterday said that FedEx Ground’s classification of some 2,300 employees as independent contractors is wrong.

Fleetowner com Files Uploads 2014 08 Gi Fed Ex G Round Driver" width="250" height="" />

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal yesterday said that FedEx Ground’s classification of some 2,300 employees as independent contractors is wrong. The court ruled, in a case that covers employees in California from 2000 through 2007, that these contractors were in fact employees of FedEx Ground and the company may now be liable for millions of dollars in restitution for these drivers, most of whom have paid out of pocket for items such as uniforms, fuel, insurance, tires, oil changes, maintenance and even the FedEx Ground trucks they drive, said the law firm of Leonard Carder, which handled the case on behalf of the drivers.

The complete ruling can be found at leonardcarder.com.

According to the law firm, the judge writing the majority opinion found that the “plaintiffs are employees as a matter of law under California’s right-to-control test.”

The law firm said the impact of the ruling could cause a trickle-down effect on as many as two dozen similar cases nationwide in which FedEx Ground drivers are challenging their status as independent contractors. It also could shake the foundation of the independent contractor model used throughout the trucking industry.

“FedEx Ground built its business on the backs of individuals it labelled as independent contractors, promising them the entrepreneurial American Dream,” said Leonard Carder Attorney Beth A. Ross. “However, as Judge Trott said in his concurring opinion, not all that glitters is gold.”

The law firm laid out some specifics of what it said is FedEx Ground’s business model, including that in some cases, workers were required to pay the wages of employees who FedEx Ground required them to hire to cover for them if they were sick or needed a vacation. Also, the firm said, the “contractors” worked at the “whims of FedEx management and FedEx Ground’s decisions on staffing and routes left the employee drivers stuck with expensive long-term truck leases on FedEx branded trucks.”

Fleetowner com Files Uploads 2014 08 Gi Fed Ex G Round Driver 2 0" width="250" height="" />

An appeals court has ruled that FedEx Ground drivers in California are not independent contractors, but rather should be classified as employees of the company. (Getty Images)

“Nationally, thousands of FedEx Ground drivers must pay for the privilege of working for FedEx 55 hours a week, 52 weeks a year. Today, these workers were granted rights and benefits entitled to employees under California law. To be clear, the Ninth Circuit exposed FedEx Ground’s independent contractor model as unlawful,” said Ross.

One of the underlying issues at work here, of course, is pay and benefits. Just a few short years ago, another FedEx Corp. company, FedEx Express, was embroiled in a tough battle with rival UPS and the Teamsters over the classification of its drivers. Express drivers are currently classified under the FAA, which UPS and the Teamsters wished to change. Those entities lobbied members of Congress when the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2009 came up for debate to get wording included in the bill that would put Express drivers under the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Act, under which UPS drivers are covered.

Doing this would have made it easier for the drivers to unionize, thereby raising costs for FedEx Express. It’s obviously why both UPS and the Teamsters would support such a decision.

FedEx spent millions fighting that – even creating a nickname for the efforts, dubbed Brown Bailout, and a special website - and eventually got the wording removed.

Here’s a video that appeared on Brownbailout.com putting the fight in context (at least from Federal Express’ viewpoint).